ගෑනුන්ට බෑනේ බුදු වෙන්න
සම්මා සම්බුද්ධ වෙන්න
කවදාවත්ම...
අපට පුලුවන්
එකම දේ
හාමුදුරුවන්ට
කන්න බොන්න දානේ
හදල දීල
කුස්සියට වෙලා,
ලබන ආත්මේ පිරිමියෙක් වෙලා
ඉපදිලා
ඊට පස්සෙ
බුදු වෙන්න
ලැබෙන්න කියල ප්රාර්ථනා
කර කර ඉන්න... ! *
Is Lokopakaraya misogynistic?
Lokopakaraya is a Sinhala religious classical poetry book written in 18th century by a Buddhist monk called Ven.
Ranasgalle Thero.
Considered as one of the longest “Upadesha” poems, along with
the other important advisory religious & literary texts in Sinhala literature: Loveda
Sangarawa, Subashithaya & Sirith Maldama, this poetic literary genre was flourished in Asian Pali & Sanskrit Literature.
Upadesha means advices, teachings & instructions in Sanskrit language. The name Lokopokaraya coined as Loka + Upkaraya which means a guide to live in the world
which contains valuable advices for day today life. These texts were directly influenced by
Buddhists Jathaka stories & folk tales while it had been used as a primary
education material in the early education system in Sri Lanka.
Undoubtedly, Lokapakarya is a masterpiece with
its undying value over the centuries, but the aim of this article is to outline
the underlying misogyny of women depicted in this literary piece of Art which needs to be
questioned & re-examined in 21st century.
It has 28 poems shedding light on the nature of women & the author seems to manifest his misogyny in numerous ways, including sexual discrimination, belittling of women and sexual objectification of women.
From a feminist critical point of view , rather a more humane perspective, it disturbs me a lot as this hatred, belittling
thoughts on women which had led to sexism in present Sri Lankan society.
What is
sexism in its definition?
New Oxford
American Dictionary (3 ed.). Oxford University Press, defines Sexism as
"prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women,
on the basis of sex."
Encyclopedia
Britannica, Online Academic Edition. 2015. notes that
"sexism in
a society is most commonly applied against women and girls. It functions to
maintain patriarchy, or male domination, through ideological and material
practices of individuals, collectives, and institutions that oppress women and
girls on the basis of sex or gender."
These poems
were never pointed out as misogynistic carrying sexist attitudes mainly because
these texts were penned by male authors, particularly Buddhists monks who lived
celibate lives. As Buddhist texts were considered “sacred” depicting the “ultimate”
truth & the philosophy, no one bothered or dared to question its sociological aspects.
One purpose
of Literature is to narrate the truth in an artistic way. As there is no such a
“fixed” truth , when it comes to Reality or Art, we have to understand that a
text reflects the personal opinion of a person , not an eternal truth. Once it has
been read, critically analyzed & validated by many erudite readers, the
idea establishes firmly in the respective society and becomes a practice in day
today life. The real literature is a direct influence to the system, while it
can have positive & negative impact according to what it narrates.
We can
apply this idea to our text in question, it is written by a Man – a Single Man –
a Religious Man – Read by men ( as women
did not have access to Literature)- analyzed by men ( critics were men) –
validated only by men ( literary tradition continued by men , please note that Sri
Lankan Literature is still male dominated & women were mostly viewed from male
point of view ), therefore, sexist.
Let us now
look at some examples.
Poem 56
සග මොක් දෙකට
යන මඟ
අකුලි මාවත
නිරා යන
විස මුසු
අමායුරු ලියෝ
මායම් පිරූ
බදුනකි
(Meaning:
Women are like pots of poisonous magic potion, they are the barriers to attain Nirvana; the enlightenment.)
Woman is
the ultimate taboo, she is the one who blocks Men from attaining Nirvana the
enlightenment! She had been the “headache” to many who wanted ultimate “freedom”.
Therefore, she should be avoided at any cost.
Likewise Yashodara
with a new born baby Rahula was a barrier to Great Siddartha Gauthama in his search
for eternal Freedom. Thanha , Rathee, Ranga,
the three vices were always portrayed
as fatal women of desire who tempted Buddha just before enlightenment. Lord Buddha
hesitated at first to offer priesthood to women.
Being a
Buddhist , I don’t question his vast intellectual philosophy, we can justify
his action to save humanity, his quest for an eternal truth , renouncing
worldly matters “including” women.
But, it’s
clear that Buddhism or the wrong interpretation of Buddhist Teaching too has
its fundamentalist attitudes towards women which have directly influenced the
condition of women in Sri Lankan society in general.
May be this has led to the popular saying in Sinhala “Surawa
( Alcohol) , Sooduwa ( Casino), Sthriya (Woman)” are the three things you
should avoid at any cost to live a healthy life. Growing up, I, myself never
saw the value of being a woman, I also saw it as a barrier to achieve “ great”
things in life such as Nirvana. If I, as a
woman being a barrier to myself, Nirvana seemed so far for me compared to my
male colleagues who seemed to obtain it just by leaving their women! Thus, our
“education” is always prejudiced against Women.
Another misogynistic
idea narrated on the poem is the infidelity of women. The poet has emphasized that
women should not be trusted at any circumstance as they are naturally fickle
minded & promiscuous.
Poem 46
රකුසෙක් තම
ලියක
තැබී කරඩුවක
ලා කුස තුල
එහි තුළ වන්
සිදුට
තම හිමිට
දියුණුව කළා පෙම්
(Meaning: A demon prisoned his wife inside a casket &
kept inside his stomach to protect her from other men, but one day, he found
her sleeping with another man inside his stomach)
Poem 60
ලියෝ බොරු
සෙනෙහස
පාප තම හිමි
නසත් සොරු ගෙන
කොටකුට
කළ ලොබින්
ගලින් බෝ සත්
හෙළූ ලිය මෙනි
(Meaning: In order to commit adultery, women show
false love & affection to their husbands & kill them ultimately. It is
like the woman who killed Bodhisathwa pushing him away from a cliff because she
was in love with a short man.)
Should woman need to be protected from the rest of the
world in fear of a potential adultery?
Why is the author not highlighting the male
adultery?
The examples have proved that women were incapable of keeping marital fidelity but the same literature hardly talks
about the vices of men in the society. It is apparently the duty of women to love her husband
and on the other hand husband is in general a good virtuous man.
In Sri Lankan patriarchal society , even though on surface
it looks matriarchal with a “sacred” place given to the virtuous “mother”, the desires of women are not really validated. Her struggle is to prove that she’s a good woman
through out her life, even her husband cannot trust her. The role she has to play is forced upon her , the " sacred" woman she has to be through out her life.
Poem 63, objectifies women by comparing her to a "Baduwa". "Baduwa" means a commercial good, ironically in colloquial Sinhala, people call the same word to a young attractive female. If she's selling her body, there should be someone to buy her? Why cannot the author be poetic about the buyer?
Poem 63
උරණ නොව හැම
කල
යෙහෙන් රකිතත්
පණ සෙ නිතියෙන්
බඩුවක් මෙන්
විකිණි
පහස දෙත් කාට
වත් අඟනෝ
( Meaning: Even though, you try to love & care women like your life , they would give pleasure to anyone like a prostitute who sells her body)
The author continues to emphasize that woman is never worthy of appreciation, belittle, demean her value comparing her to animals such as cats, dogs, poisonous snakes, fox, crows etc.
Poem 67
දරු පෙම් ගුණ
නුවණ
සමත් බැව් හැම
කියති මළ කල
තම ලිය ගුණ
ඇතත්
නොකිය වියතුනි
මළත් උන්නත්
( Meaning : When someone is dead, everyone talks about his good deeds, his knowledge, service to society. But, dead or alive, you should never praise your wife)
Poem 68
සිරිමත් කළත්
ලිය
ලුහු දනටම ලොබ
වඩත් මැයි
කිරෙන් බත්
ලූවත්
සුනකයෝ කසලටම
ලොබ වෙත්
( Meaning : Even though you try to feed dogs with luxury food such as milk, they prefer to eat garbage. Likewise women also prefer to associate immoral villains)
Poem 53
සලෙලුන් දැක
ලියන්
සැඟවෙනු නොවේ
බලව විළියෙන්
බළලුන් ගොදුර
තම
පැමිණෙන තෙක්
වැන්න සැඟවෙනු.
( Meaning: When women meet seducers, they are not actually shy or afraid of them, they are like cats who wait for their prey)
These examples show clearly the misogynistic attitude of the author. It must have portrayed the actual truth of ancient Sri Lankan society & the consequences of these attitudes are still reflected in our culture.
While I leave the readers to read, analyse & judge further the above poems, I would like end my article with the following questions.
Shouldn't we make an effort to separate Literature from religious fundamentalism in our society?
Is Woman still a threat to Man? Is she still the Second Sex?
In 21st century Sri Lankan context, should not we re-write literary & religious texts such as Lokopkaraya dismantling all sexist themes in order to ensure gender equality?
Why Literature?
By Jahooli Devi
*Translation : Women can never attain the Buddhahood, they have to to be reborn as male to achieve it.
